NURS 6504-Systematically developed recommendations Discussion 2

Systematically developed recommendations Discussion 2

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! Systematically developed recommendations Discussion 2 .

Clinical Practice Guidelines LEVEL IV

Systematically developed recommendations from nationally recognized experts based on research evidence or expert consensus panel

· Consensus or Position Statement LEVEL IV

Systematically developed recommendations, based on research and nationally recognized expert opinion, that guide members of a professional organization in decision-making for an issue of concern

· Are the types of evidence included identified?

· Yes

· No

· Were appropriate stakeholders involved in the development of recommendations?

· Yes

· No

· Are groups to which recommendations apply and do not apply clearly stated?

· Yes

· No

· Have potential biases been eliminated?

· Yes

· No

· Does each recommendation have an identified level of evidence stated?

· Yes

· No

· Are recommendations clear?

· Yes

· No

Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question

Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Appendix F

Non-Research Evidence Appraisal

· Literature review LEVEL V

Summary of selected published literature including scientific and nonscientific such as reports of organizational experience and opinions of experts

· Integrative review LEVEL V

Summary of research evidence and theoretical literature; analyzes, compares themes, notes gaps in the selected literature

· Is subject matter to be reviewed clearly stated?

· Yes

· No

· Is literature relevant and up-to-date (most sources are within the past five years or classic)?

· Yes

· No

· Of the literature reviewed, is there a meaningful analysis of the conclusions across the articles included in the review?

· Yes

· No

· Are gaps in the literature identified?

· Yes

· No

· Are recommendations made for future practice or study?

· Yes

· No

Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question

Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

· Expert opinion LEVEL V

Opinion of one or more individuals based on clinical expertise

· Has the individual published or presented on the topic?

· Yes

· No

· Is the author’s opinion based on scientific evidence?

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! Systematically developed recommendations Discussion 2 .

· Yes

· No

· Is the author’s opinion clearly stated?

· Yes

· No

· Are potential biases acknowledged?

· Yes

· No

Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question

Complete the corresponding quality rating section.

Organizational Experience

· Quality improvement LEVEL V

Cyclical method to examine workflows, processes, or systems with a specific organization

· Financial evaluation LEVEL V

Economic evaluation that applies analytic techniques to identify, measure, and compare the cost and outcomes of two or more alternative programs or interventions

· Program evaluation LEVEL V

Systematic assessment of the processes and/or outcomes of a program; can involve both quaNtitative and quaLitative methods