PA 005 Assignment: Program/Policy Evaluations: Assess outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations
PA 005 Assignment: Program/Policy Evaluations: Assess outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations
Research and select a population health program/policy evaluation report that has been completed and shared. Based on the population health program/policy evaluation you selected, address the following in the Population Health Program/Policy Analysis Template:
Describe the population health program/policy outcomes.
Explain how the success of the population health program/policy was measured in the evaluation.
Identify how many people were reached by the population health program/policy based on the population health program/policy evaluation you selected.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Describe at what point the population health program/policy evaluation occurred.
Describe the sources of data that were used to conduct the population health program/policy evaluation.
Explain at least one potential added benefit and one potential unintended consequence of the population health program/policy, based on the results of the population health program/policy evaluation. Be specific and provide examples.
Explain which stakeholders were approached or involved in conducting the population health program/policy evaluation. Which stakeholder would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation that was conducted? Be specific and provide examples.
Explain whether the population health program/policy successfully met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. Was the population program/policy successful? Why or why not?
Explain whether you would recommend continuing or implementing this population health program/policy. Be specific and provide examples.
Describe at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating this population health program/policy after one year of implementation. Be specific and provide examples.
In order to achieve Exceeds Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in the row, and in addition, your response must reflect a depth and breadth of knowledge and expertise. Examples of this include—but are not limited to—the following:
You provide additional, specific, and/or particularly relevant examples to illustrate points made.
You seamlessly incorporate your original thoughts and diverse, credible, and relevant academic sources, when applicable, to express your viewpoint or develop a persuasive argument.
You demonstrate a deeper understanding of the subject that draws from discipline-specific knowledge and theory and incorporates the viewpoints of a diverse set of business and management thought leaders.
You draw additional connections between multiple, complex topics to support your explanations.
You are able to apply your knowledge in unique, creative, and/or innovative ways.
You thoroughly break down concepts into simpler parts and use your understanding of business to make connections.
Your analysis is insightful and original.
You design processes, products, and/or solutions that are creative, high-quality, and innovative.
You consider diverse perspectives and relevant social, ethical, and business-related issues when proposing new ideas or formulating.
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template
Use this document to complete the PA005 Assessment.
| Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation |
|
| Description |
|
| Describe the healthcare program/policy outcomes.
|
|
| Explain how the success of the healthcare program/policy was measured in the evaluation.
|
|
| Identify how many people were reached by the healthcare program/policy based on the healthcare program/policy evaluation you selected.
|
|
| Describe at what point the healthcare program/policy evaluation occurred.
|
|
| Describe the sources of data that were used to conduct the healthcare program/policy evaluation.
|
|
| Explain at least one potential added benefit and one potential unintended consequence of the healthcare program/policy, based on the results of the healthcare program/policy evaluation. Be specific and provide examples.
|
|
| Explain which stakeholders were approached or involved in conducting the healthcare program/policy evaluation. Which stakeholder would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation that was conducted? Be specific and provide examples.
|
|
| Explain whether the healthcare program/policy successfully met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. Was the healthcare program/policy successful? Why or why not?
|
|
| Explain whether you would recommend continuing or implementing this program/policy in your place of work. Be specific and provide examples.
|
|
| Describe at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program/policy after one year of implementation. Be specific and provide examples.
|
|
| General Notes/Comments |
|
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
PA005: Program/Policy Evaluations: Assess outcomes of population health program/policy evaluations.
Assessment Rubric
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| Module 1: Program/Policy Evaluations | |||
| Complete the Population Health Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template and address the following:
· Describe the population health program/policy outcomes. |
Response does not include an adequate Population Health Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template as it does not adequately describe the population health program/policy outcomes. | Response includes an adequate Population Health Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template as it adequately describes the population health program/policy outcomes. | Response includes an exemplary Population Health Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template as it clearly and comprehensively describes the population health program/policy outcomes. |
| Learning Objective 1.1: Describe population healthprogram/policy outcomes | |||
| · Explain how the success of the population health program/policy was measured in the evaluation. | Response does not adequately explain how the success of the population health program/policy was measured in the evaluation. | Response adequately explains how the success of the population health program/policy was measured in the evaluation. | Response clearly and comprehensively explains how the success of the population health program/policy was measured in the evaluation. |
| Learning Objective 1.2: Explainmethods for measuring the success of population health | |||
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet
Expectations |
Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| programs/policies | |||
| · Identify how many people
were reached by the population health program/policy based on the population health program/policy evaluation selected.
Learning Objective 1.3: Describe the reach and impactof population health programs/policies |
Response does not adequately identify how many people
were reached by the population health program/policy based on the population health program/policy evaluation selected. |
Response adequately identifies how many people
were reached by the population health program/policy based on the population health program/policy evaluation selected. |
Response accurately and thoroughly identifies how many people
were reached by the population health program/policy based on the population health program/policy evaluation selected. |
| · Describe at what point the population health program/policy
evaluation occurred. Learning Objective 1.4: Describe the point at which anevaluation of a population health program/policy occurred |
Response does not adequately describe at what point the population health program/policy evaluation occurred. | Response adequately describes at what point the population health program/policy evaluationoccurred. | Response clearly and comprehensively describes at what point the population health program/policy evaluationoccurred. |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet
Expectations |
Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| Module 2: Reports and Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations | |||
| · Describe the sources of data that were used to conduct the population health program/policy evaluation.
Learning Objective 2.1: Identifythe types of data used to perform and conduct population health program/policyevaluations |
Response does not adequately describe the sources of datathat were used to conduct the population health program/policy evaluation. | Response adequately describes the sources of datathat were used to conduct the population health program/policy evaluation. | Response clearly and comprehensively describes the sources of data that were used to conduct the population health program/policy evaluation. |
| · Explain at least one potential added benefit and
one potential unintended consequence of the population health program/policy, based on the results of the healthcare program/policy evaluation.
Learning Objective 2.2: Analyzeadded benefits and unintended consequences revealed through program/policy evaluations |
Response does not adequately explain at least one potential added benefit and
one potential unintended consequence of the population health program/policy, based on the results of the healthcareprogram/policy evaluation. |
Response adequately explains at least one potential added benefit and
one potential unintended consequence of the population health program/policy, based on the results of the healthcareprogram/policy evaluation. |
Response clearly and comprehensively explains at least one potential added benefit and
one potential unintended consequence of the population health program/policy, based on the results of the healthcareprogram/policy evaluation. |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet
Expectations |
Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| · Explain which stakeholders were approached or involved in conducting the population health program/policy evaluation.
Learning Objective 2.3: Explainstakeholders identified in program/policy evaluations |
Response does not adequately explain which stakeholders
were approached or involved in conducting the population health program/policy evaluation. |
Response adequately explains which stakeholders
were approached or involved in conducting the population health program/policy evaluation. |
Response clearly and comprehensively explains which stakeholders
were approached or involved in conducting the population health program/policy evaluation. |
| Which stakeholder would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation that was conducted? Be specific and provide examples.
Learning Objective 2.4: Explainwho benefits from results and reporting of program/policy evaluations |
Response does not adequately explain which stakeholder
would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation that was conducted.
Response is not adequately specific.
Response does not provide adequate examples. |
Response adequately explains which stakeholder
would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation that was conducted.
Response is adequate in its specificity.
Response provides adequate examples. |
Response clearly and comprehensively explains which stakeholder
would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program/policy evaluation that was conducted.
Response provides complete, thorough, and explicit information that fully supports the accurate and comprehensive details provided.
Response provides clear |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet
Expectations |
Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| and comprehensive
examples. |
|||
| · Explain whether the population health program/policy successfully
met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. Was the population health program/policy successful? Why or why not?
Learning Objective 2.5: Evaluate whether population health programs/policies met original intents and outcomes |
Response does not adequately explain whether the population health program/policy successfully
met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. |
Response adequately explains whether the population health program/policy successfully
met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. |
Response clearly and comprehensively explains whether the population health program/policy successfully
met the original intent of the outcomes that were identified. |
| · Explain whether you would recommend continuing or implementing this population health program or policy. Be specific and provide
examples. |
Response does not adequately explain whether continuing or implementing this population health program or policy would be recommended.
Response is not adequately specific. |
Response adequately explains whether continuing or implementing this population health program or policy would be recommended.
Response is adequate in its specificity. |
Response clearly and comprehensively explains whether continuing or implementing this population health program or policy would be recommended.
Response provides complete, thorough, and |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet
Expectations |
Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
|
Learning Objective 2.6: Analyzewhether population health programs/policies should be continued or implemented |
Response does not provide adequate examples. | Response provides adequate examples. | explicit information that fully supports the accurate and comprehensive details provided.
Response provides clear and comprehensive examples. |
| · Describe at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating this population health program/policy after one year of implementation. Be specific and provide examples.
Learning Objective 2.7: Analyzehow nurse advocates become involved in population health program/policy evaluations post-implementation |
Response does not adequately describe at least two ways that, as a nurse advocate, one could become involved in evaluating this population health program/policy after one year of implementation.
Response is not adequately specific.
Response does not provide adequate examples. |
Response adequately describes at least two ways that, as a nurse advocate, one could become involved in evaluating this population health program/policy after one year of implementation.
Response is adequate in its specificity.
Response provides adequate examples. |
Response clearly and comprehensively describes at least two ways that, as a nurse advocate, one could become involved in evaluating this population health program/policy after one year of implementation.
Response provides complete, thorough, and explicit information that fully supports the accurate and comprehensive details provided.
Response provides clear and comprehensive examples. |
Professional Skills Assessment
| Professional Writing | |||
| Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization | Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. |
Content contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is satisfactorily clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional
editing/revision. |
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is clear, logical, and well-organized. |
| Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone | Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias.
Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. |
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. | Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. |
| Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas | Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to | Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference | Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference |
| reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. There are numerous and/or significant
errors. |
requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one or two minor
errors. |
requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. |
| Professional Presentation | |||
| Professional Presentation: Clarity, Flow, and Organization | Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. | Content presented is satisfactorily clear, logical and/or organized, but could benefit
from additional editing/revision. |
Content is presented clearly, logically, and is well- organized. |
| Professional Presentation: Context,
Audience, Purpose, and Tone |
Presented content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or
purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. |
Content presented demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and
purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. |
Content
presented clearly demonstr ates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, free from bias and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. |
| Professional
Presentation: Originality, S ource Credibility & Attribution of Ideas |
Content presented does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates |
Content presented adequately reflects original writing and
paraphrasing. Writing |
Content presented reflects o riginal thought and writing and proper
paraphrasing. Writing |
| inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are numerous and/or significant errors. | demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. There are one
or two minor errors. |
demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. |