NURS 8503 Week 11 Assignment: Disseminating Results Back to the Organization

Week 11: Disseminating Results Back to the Organization

Throughout the past 10 weeks, you have worked to implement a project management plan for practice change at your clinical site. You have explored your role as a leader in the implementation of this plan through the exploration of ethical and legal implications, assessment and management of barriers and pitfalls, collection and analysis of data, and the reflection of the process and practice change. These opportunities have led to this point, wherein you will disseminate the results back to the organization and your colleagues in this course.

This week, you present your problem change to your colleagues in this course. You will also disseminate the results of the project implementation to key stakeholders, and you will reflect on your practicum experience.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Learning Objectives

Students will:

Present the project implementation
Disseminate results of project implementation within the organization to key stakeholders
Collaborate with preceptor and team to determine if external dissemination of results is appropriate
Reflect on practicum experience

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.

Chapter 9, “Dissemination” (pp. 207–218)

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2019). Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

Chapter 12, “Dissemination of Evidence” (pp. 255–270)

Practicum Resources (click to expand/reduce)

Document: Practicum Time Log and Journal (Word document)

Walden University. (n.d.). Field experience – DNP: Manuals. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/DNP/Manuals

Meditrek. (n.d.). Welcome to Meditrek. https://edu.meditrek.com/Default.html

Note: Use this website to log in to Meditrek to report your clinical hours and patient encounters.

Blog: Dissemination of Project Presentation

Starting in the first week of this course, you began the implementation process for your practice change. You have considered ethical and legal implications, managed barriers and pitfalls, collected data and evaluated results, and considered how to maintain the change. Now, you will disseminate the results to your practicum site and your colleagues in this course.

What is the best way to present your project? What do you need to include, what do you need to clarify, and what lessons did you learn? What do the results mean, and how did your leadership skills and style assist you throughout this process?

Photo Credit: Getty Images

For this Blog, you will have the opportunity to present your problem change project implementation to your colleagues. Consider how you can present your results, what to highlight, and what might need further exploration.

To Prepare

Review your project and determine how you can present your results to your colleagues.

By Day 3 of Week 11

Post a five-slide, narrated presentation to present your project to your colleagues. You may select the technology to construct your presentation (VoiceThread, narrated PowerPoint, etc.); however, you must ensure the link can be easily viewed by your Instructor and peers.

By Day 6 of Week 11

View a selection of your colleagues’ presentations. Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by expanding on their presentations or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Blog Rubric

Post by Day 3 of Week 11 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 11

To Participate in this Blog:

Week 11 Blog

Assignment: Journal Entry 3

Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective. It should connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. See the Practicum Guidelines, located in the Practicum area and in this week’s Learning Resources, for a complete description of the practicum.

Submit your Assignment by Day 5 of Week 11.

Photo Credit: Ellagrin / iStock / Getty Images Plus / Getty Images

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 5 of Week 11

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 11 Assignment

Congratulations! After you have finished all the assignments for this week, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Content

Name: NURS_8503_Week11_Blog_Rubric

	Excellent 90–100	Good 80–89	Fair 70–79	Poor 0–69
Main Posting: Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.	Points Range: 54 (54%) – 60 (60%) Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.	Points Range: 48 (48%) – 53 (53%) Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.	Points Range: 42 (42%) – 46 (46%) Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 41 (41%) Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Main Posting: Writing	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting: Timely and full participation	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Blog post by due date.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Posts main Discussion by due date. Meets requirements for full participation.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts main Blog post by due date.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Blog post by due date.
First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
First Response: Writing	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing.
First Response: Timely and full participation	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date.
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Second Response: Writing	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing.
Second Response: Timely and full participation	Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date.	Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date.
Total Points: 100

Excellent

90–100

Good

80–89

Fair

70–79

Poor

0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Points Range: 54 (54%) – 60 (60%)

Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Points Range: 48 (48%) – 53 (53%)

Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Points Range: 42 (42%) – 46 (46%)

Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 41 (41%)

Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Main Posting:

Writing

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Blog post by due date.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

Meets requirements for full participation.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts main Blog post by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Blog post by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication.

Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions is missing.

First Response:
Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication.

Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions is missing.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_8503_Week11_Blog_Rubric