HUMN 303 Week 4 Assignment: Literary Movements

Week 4: Literary Movements

Week 4 Literary Movements

Discussion

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

Textbook: Chapter 7, 8

Lesson

Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook – for historical/political influences)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Initial Post Instructions

Choose one of the literary movements that you read about this week and at least one work from that movement. Movements, authors, and famous works are discussed in the lesson as well. You do not have to choose authors or works discussed in the lesson, but you may. For your initial post, address one of the following:

Option 1: Examine the literary movement and specific work in relation to historical and political influences of the movement. Include a one paragraph summary of the plot before moving on to the examination of the work in relation to the movement.

Option 2: Examine a specific artwork influenced by a literary work and how the artist captured the subject or story. Discuss how the art piece reflects themes that defined the literary movement. Here are a few examples, but you are not restricted to this list:

Asher B. Durand’s Thanatopsis (influenced by William Cullen Bryant’s “Thanatopsis”)

John William Waterhouse’s The Lady of Shalott (influenced by Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s “The Lady of Shalott”)

Sir John Everett Millais’s Ophelia (influenced by Shakespeare’s Ophelia from Hamlet)

Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s Apollo and Daphne or The Rape of Prosperina (influenced by ancient myths)

Ancient Greek vase painting (influenced by various ancient myths)

Follow-Up Post Instructions

Respond to at least one peer. Respond to one peer who chose an option different from yours. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.

Writing Requirements

Minimum of 2 posts (1 initial & 1 follow-up)

Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)

APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Grading

This activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link:

Link (webpage): Discussion Guidelines

Course Outcomes

CO 1: Identify the content, forms, and/or techniques of work of art (e.g., architecture, fine art, literature, and/or drama).

CO 2: Analyze the content, forms, and/or techniques of a work of art (e.g., architecture, fine art, literature, and/or drama).

CO 3: Explain the historical/cultural/social context in which a work was created.

CO 4: Classify works of art using different approaches (by discipline, genre, style, period, etc.) in order to contextualize the works and relate them to a variety of influences.

Posts must be on two separate days.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed

Discussion Grading Rubric_Gen Ed_ JAN21

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Content

7 ptsOutstanding

Addresses ALL aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding ALL weekly concepts.

5 ptsVery Good

Addresses MOST aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of MOST of the weekly concepts.

3 ptsCompetent

Address SOME aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of SOME of the weekly concepts.

0 ptsPoor

Minimally address the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Evidence & Sources

4 ptsOutstanding

Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.

3 ptsVery Good

Integrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited.

2 ptsCompetent

Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.

0 ptsPoor

Does not integrate any evidence.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-up Post

8 ptsOutstanding

Response furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

6 ptsVery Good

Response furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion

4 ptsCompetent

Response does not further the dialogue significantly; add little depth to the discussion.

0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to another student or instructor.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication

4 ptsOutstanding

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

3 ptsVery Good

Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

2 ptsCompetent

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

0 ptsPoor

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Responses

2 ptsOutstanding

Posts in the discussion on two different days.

0 ptsPoor

Posts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all.

2 pts

Total Points: 25