NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

As an advanced practice nurse, you must remain current on health issues that commonly impact women such as birth control, abortion, family planning, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Many of these women’s health issues are heavily influenced by political, social, and sociocultural factors. These influences might not only affect a woman’s ability or desire to receive care, but also a provider’s ability or willingness to offer care. How might political, social, and sociocultural factors influence your personal perceptions of these women’s health issues? NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

To prepare for NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health:

· Review this week’s media presentation, as well as Chapter 1 of the Schuiling and Likis text.

· Select and research one of the following women’s health issues: birth control, abortion, family planning, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in women, or another issue approved by the course Instructor.

· Consider the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on the women’s health issue you selected.

· Reflect on how the personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.

By Day 3

Post an explanation of the women’s health issue you selected, including the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on this issue. Explain how personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected different issues than you did. Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Discussion: Political, Social, and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

To prepare for NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health:

· Review this week’s media presentation, as well as Chapter 1 of the Schuiling and Likis text.

· Consider the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on the women’s health issue you selected.

· Reflect on how the personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.

By Day 3

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
ContentName: NURS_6551_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View List View Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement   Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.           Points:
Points Range:    44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible references
   Feedback:     Main Posting:
Writing           Points:
Points Range:    6 (6%) – 6 (6%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:     Main Posting:
Timely and full participation           Points:
Points Range:    10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation
Feedback: First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points:
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
   Feedback:     First Response:
Writing           Points:
Points Range:    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited
   Feedback:     First Response:
Timely and full participation           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts by due date
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation
   Feedback:     Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.           Points:
Points Range:    9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
   Feedback:     Second Response:
Writing           Points:
Points Range:    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited
   Feedback:     Second Response:
Timely and full participation           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts by due date
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation
Feedback:
Show DescriptionsShow Feedback
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Excellent Performance40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references
Competent Performance35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references
Proficient Performance31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible references

Feedback:

Main Posting:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health
Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleFeedback:

Main Posting:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Excellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Competent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Proficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depthFeedback: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment

First Response:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are citedFeedback:

First Response:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Excellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Competent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Proficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 6 (6%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health
Response may not be on topic, lacks depthFeedback:

Second Response:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are citedFeedback:

Second Response:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:

Total Points: 100

NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion: Political Social and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Discussion: Political, Social, and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health

Leave a ReplyCancel Reply