Assignment: week 2 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker/NURS 6051

Assignment: week 2 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker/NURS 6051

Assignment: week 2 The Nurse Leader as Knowledge Worker/NURS 6051

The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book, The Landmarks of Tomorrow (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar?

Nurses are very much knowledge workers. What has changed since Drucker’s time are the ways that knowledge can be acquired. The volume of data that can now be generated and the tools used to access this data have evolved significantly in recent years and helped healthcare professionals (among many others) to assume the role of knowledge worker in new and powerful ways.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

In this Assignment, you will consider the evolving role of the nurse leader and how this evolution has led nurse leaders to assume the role of knowledge worker. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation with an infographic (graphic that visually represents information, data, or knowledge. Infographics are intended to present information quickly and clearly.) to educate others on the role of nurse as knowledge worker.

Reference: Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

***The Assignment: NURS 6051 Powerpoint***

  • Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.
  • Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.
  • Include one slide that visually represents the role of a nurse leader as knowledge worker.
  • Your PowerPoint should Include the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. (PLEASE SEE MY MAIN POST BELOW)
  • Include your examination of the data that you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from that data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ responses.

***Presentation must includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

**** Listed below is a copy of my paper I shared in the discussion forum that contains my hypothetical Scenario. (My hypothetical Scenario is about a facility that was having a lot of medication errors prior to switching to an eMAR system. I have attached the main post for you to read)

THIS IS MY MAIN POST FOR WEEK 1.

Main Post Week 1

Patient safety is top priority for health care systems therefore, there are always new technology or procedures being implemented to help improve patient safety and outcomes. “Nurses are at the center of care coordination for patients, and informatics nurses are central to the design and development of information systems that support workflow in nursing practice” (Walden University, 2022). Informatics is imperative to effective nursing care and will always play a major role in the nursing profession. “The unfolding of new health care paradigms will bring greater connectivity between care providers and patients, include a wide array of emerging technologies and an increasing emphasis on data analytics will make the integration of informatics competencies into every area of nursing an imperative” (Nagle, Sermeus and Junger, 2017).

Access and use of data in healthcare can play a major role in improving patient outcomes. Therefore, one scenario that could benefit from data access is a case where a facility is experiencing high cases of medication errors. Medication errors can lead to several adverse reactions, such as a patient’s death; hence data-based solutions should be explored. One technology implemented in hospitals nationwide was the introduction of the Electronic Medical Administration Record through the EMR. This was a massive change and learning curve for many nurses as they had to stop paper charting which they had been accustomed to for years. They now had to learn how to use a computer to chart, communicate with doctors and administers meds electronically. The push to go electronic centered around patient safety. There were many errors occurring that affected patient safety that were deemed preventable had there been proper safeguards in place such as a computer system to prompt safety alerts and double check reminders. The eMAR “allows nurses to acknowledge orders, document the medications administered to the patient, and to communicate online with physicians and pharmacists. Moreover, the eMAR application reminded nurses about medications that were due for each patient and the MAR is visible to every team member” (Vicente et. Al., 2017).

This new technology has not been adopted by every health care institution because there are still facilities today such as nursing homes that use paper charting for medication administration. A friend of mine had shared with me her experience working at a nursing home and explained that there were many medication errors as a result of paper charting. She said that some of these errors included documentation that a medication was given when it was not or nurses accidentally administering more than the prescribed dose. The chances of these errors occurring could have greatly decreased had there been an electronic system in place prompting the nurses to scan the patient’s bracelet followed by each medication and then reading the computer screen for safeguard notifications. An eMAR system can be used to collect data on the number of medication errors and to determine if the nurses are using the five rights of medication administration (Vogelsmeier et al.,2022). The same data can also be accessed by every staff through user interface login. This process will lead to the development of knowledge; for example, the professionals will be able to determine if the eMAR system has reduced the rates of medication errors and formulate a way forward in terms of using appropriate strategies to contain the situation. The rates of medication errors after the intervention can be compared with the rates before the use of eMAR to determine efficacy.

Such data is vital as they can produce information to be used by the nurse leaders. By determining the clinical importance of the information produced from the data, nurse leaders can implement workshops and in-service training on patient safety regarding medication errors. Nurse leaders can reinforce the importance of the five rights of medication administration and encourage nurses to continuously pay attention to all the safeguards and prompts cued by the eMAR system. Nurse leaders need to stress the importance of reporting medication errors so that improvements can be made in the system for better outcomes. Lastly, nurse leaders must also be approachable and create a judgment free environment so that staff can feel comfortable and supported when they report medication errors.

References:

Vogelsmeier, A., Jacobs, A., Owen, C., Mosa, A. S. M., & Subramanian, R. (2022). Medication Identification Device to Reduce Medication Errors in Nursing Homes: A Controlled Pilot Study. Journal of Gerontological Nursing48(4), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20220304-01

Walden University. (2022, June 23). Nurse-informaticists-what-they-know-that-other-nurses         dont. Walden University. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from      https://www.waldenu.edu/online-masters-programs/master-of-science-in            nursing/resource/nurse-informaticists-what-they-know-that-other-nurses-dont

Nagle, L., Sermeus, W., & Junger, A. (2017, January 1). [PDF] the evolving role of the Nursing  Informatics Specialist.: Semantic scholar. Retrieved November 27, 2022,            from https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_4A0FEA56B8CB.P001/REF Links to an external site.

Vicente Oliveros, N., Gramage Caro, T., Pérez Menendez, C. C., Álvarez, D. A. M., Martín, A.   Á. S., Bermejo Vicedo, T., & Delgado Silveira, E. (2017). Effect of an electronic medication administration record application on patient safety. Journal of Evaluation in          Clinical Practice23(4), 888–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12753

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

PLEASE SEE RUBRIC BELOW

NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:· Explain the concept of a knowledge worker.· Define and explain nursing informatics.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Ably synthesize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker….The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

Summarize the literature and course resources to present a clear and accurate explanation of the 2 concepts….The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. …The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The presentation is missing one of the concepts or one of the concepts is superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The presentation is missing two concepts or the concepts are superficially addressed.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a graphic visual representation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker. On the slide, include an explanation of the role.
15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation includes a detailed graphic and explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The presentation includes a graphic and an adequate explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The presentation includes a graphic, yet the explanation of the role is not addressed or is superficially addressed.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The presentation is missing a graphic, an explanation of the role, or both the graphic and explanation of the role are missing.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresent the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues’ replies.
35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data. …The presentation incorporates peer feedback.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum; one or two of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The presentation is missing the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum or three or more of the criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePowerPoint presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Presentation includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Presentation includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Presentation includes: 1 or no resources.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The reference list and image attribution list follow correct APA format
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?