Assignment: Week 1 Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology

Assignment: Week 1 Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology

Assignment: Week 1 Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology

NRNP 6635 WEEK 1 Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology
Bio-psychosocial factors are the major drivers of psychopathology. Biological factors include genetics and structural abnormalities. Several studies have revealed how heredity contributes to the development of depression, schizophrenia, bipolar mood disorder, and anxiety among families, especially twins (Hoy et al., 2022). In some instances, structural brain abnormalities contribute to the development of psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, learning or anxiety disorders, and autism (Filho et al., 2021). Abnormal neurotransmission can also contribute to psychiatric illnesses seen in persons with bipolar mood disorder, who have an altered dopamine and serotonin neurotransmission.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Psychological factors affect how individuals perceive themselves, their confidence, stress, and self-esteem. Persons who have had adverse childhood experiences, social stigma, long-term illnesses, and bereavement are at risk of developing different psychiatric diseases (Chen et al., 2023). For instance, individuals who experienced childhood trauma through physical or psychological trauma, neglect, or abuse are at a higher risk of developing conduct and some personality disorders. On the other hand, persons who have experienced traumatizing experiences such as violence are also at risk of post-traumatic stress disorder, while those with social stigma are at risk of some anxiety disorders such as social phobias.
Social factors can either predispose or precipitate some mental illnesses as they influence health-seeking behaviors and coping strategies. The factors include family and friends, where they live, support from people or friends, and human interactions. For example, persons coming from low socioeconomic status are at higher risk of developing depressive and anxiety disorders resulting from financial uncertainty (Kirkbride et al., 2024). In addition, it also contributes to delayed health-seeking due to financial limitations. Current life stressors such as work stress, conflict in the family, unemployment, financial problems, loneliness, and relationship problems also contribute to the development of conditions such as depression and anxiety. Peer pressure can also contribute to some conditions, such as alcohol or substance use disorders and depression.

References
Chen, L. H., Law, W., F. Chang, D. H., & Sun, D. (2023). Editorial: The bio-psycho-social approach to understanding mental disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225433
Filho, M., Alves, M. B., & Silveira, P. P. (2021). Brain structural abnormalities in six major psychiatric disorders: Shared variation and network perspectives. F1000Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51475.2
Hoy, N., Lynch, S., Waszczuk, M., Reppermund, S., & Mewton, L. (2022). Investigating the molecular genetic, genomic, brain structural, and brain functional correlates of latent transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology across the lifespan: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the general population. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1036794
Kirkbride, J. B., Anglin, D. M., Colman, I., Dykxhoorn, J., Jones, P. B., Patalay, P., Pitman, A., Soneson, E., Steare, T., Wright, T., & Griffiths, S. L. (2024). The social determinants of mental health and disorder: Evidence, prevention and recommendations. World Psychiatry, 23(1), 58-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21160

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology

In many realms of medicine, objective diagnoses can be made: A clavicula is broken.  An infection is present. TSH levels meet the diagnostic criteria for hypothyroidism. Psychiatry, on the other hand, deals with psychological phenomena and behaviors. Can these, too, be “defined objectively and by scientific criteria (Gergen, 1985), or are they social constructions?” (Boland, Verduin, & Ruiz, 2022).

Thanks to myriad advances during recent decades, we know that psychopathology is caused by many interacting factors. Theoretical and clinical contributions to the field have come from the neural sciences, genetics, psychology, and social-cultural sciences. How do these factors impact the expression, classification, diagnosis, and prevalence of psychopathology, and why might it be important for a nurse practitioner to take a multidimensional, integrative approach?

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

To Prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, considering the many interacting factors that contribute to the development of psychopathology.
  • Consider how theoretical perspective on psychopathology impacts the work of the PMHNP.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Explain the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology.

Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by explaining the implications of why, as an advanced practice nurse, it is important to adopt a multidimensional, integrative model of psychopathology.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 to >39.0 ptsExcellent

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s). … Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

39 to >34.0 ptsGood

Responds to most of the discussion question(s). … Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least 3 credible references.

34 to >30.0 ptsFair

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

30 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to the discussion question(s). … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only 1 or no credible references.

44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent

Written clearly and concisely. … Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. … Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood

Written concisely. … May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. … Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair

Written somewhat concisely. … May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Timely and full participation
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts main discussion by due date.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

Posts main discussion by due date. … Meets requirements for full participation.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Posts main discussion by due date.

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post main discussion by due date.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. … The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. … Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post by due date.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. … The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. … Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post by due date.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?