Assignment 2: Week 9 Diagnosing, and Treating Special Populations/NRNP 6568
Assignment 2: Week 9 Diagnosing, and Treating Special Populations/NRNP 6568
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To Prepare:
Review the weekly resources.
Seek out professional resources on contract negotiations.
Review the FNP scope of practice for your state.
Seek out local NP organizations to assess which organizations would best fit your needs.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
BY DAY 7
Submit the recorded PowerPoint presentation. (This assignment does not need to be submitted through Turnitin) but you must have a reference slide to support your thoughts and ideas.
For Part 1 of this assignment:
- Discuss the type of practice and setting you would like to work out of (specialty, family, geriatrics, hospital, nursing home, hospice, urgent care, etc.). What makes for an ideal work environment?
What type of support system and staff do you need? What services do you see yourself providing? What services are you NOT willing to or are not comfortable providing?
- How will you meet your CME requirements while practicing at this setting? How will you keep track of your CME hours?
- What nursing organization(s) interest you in joining, and how will joining an organization benefit you at your position?
- Once you have met the requirements for autonomy in your state while working at your current position, and for those of you who practice in a lifetime of collaboration state, assume you will one day have autonomy. How will you maintain your collaborative relationships with other nurse practitioners you have worked with, the practitioners you have referred to, as well as your collaborative physician?
Part 2 of the assignment:
You’ve just been offered a position at the perfect job you discussed in Part 1 of the assignment.
Besides focusing on patients, reaching a fair and equitable contract that includes not only your salary and benefits but expectations of your patient load, the amount of time you will be spending at the clinic or a health care setting, and the services you will be providing, will affect how you feel about your job over time. It’s time now to consider the position’s job offer.
Part 2:
- What questions should you ask your potential future employer about the offer?
- What salary and bonus structure are acceptable to you?
- How can you figure out your net worth for the practice?
- If you are expected to take call, what percentage of your salary is reasonable toward this activity?
- List the benefits you should negotiate into your contract.
- Discuss the practice expectations with your How can you be sure that you are being asked to practice within the scope of your practice?
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
WK9Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
Develop an 8-10 slide narrated |
50 to >45.0 pts Excellent 90%– 100% Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. All questions listed in Part 1 are addressed. Response uses a professional tone. |
45 to >40.0 pts Good 80%–89% Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. A maximum of one – two questions listed in Part 1 are missing. Response uses a professional tone. |
40 to >35.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Presentation is formatted in a somewhat clear and professional business manner. A maximum of three – four questions listed in Part 1 are missing. Tone is not uniformly professional. |
35 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Presentation is not formatted correctly and has errors in professional business manner. More than four questions listed in Part 1 are missing. Tone is not uniformly professional. |
||
PowerPoint
presentation |
||||||
discussing
questions listed in Part 1 and Part 2 |
||||||
of the assignment.
Part 1: Briefly |
||||||
discuss type of practice setting,
ideal work |
50 pts |
|||||
environment, support system,
services provided, |
||||||
CME
requirements, |
||||||
nursing organizations,
state requirements, |
||||||
and collaborative agreements. | ||||||
Part 2: Briefly discuss
employment offer, salary and bonus structure, contract negotiation, benefits, and practice expectations. |
50 to >45.0 pts Excellent 90%– 100% Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. All questions listed in Part 2 are |
45 to >40.0 pts Good 80%–89% Presentation is formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. A maximum of one – two questions listed in Part 2 are |
40 to >35.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Presentation is formatted in a somewhat clear and professional business manner. A maximum of three – four questions listed in Part 2 are |
35 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Presentation is not formatted correctly and has errors in professional business manner. More than four |
50 pts |
|
addressed. Response uses a
professional tone. |
missing. Response uses a professional
tone. |
missing. Tone is not uniformly
professional. |
questions listed in Part 2 are
missing. Tone is |
|||
not uniformly professional. | ||||||
Design: Slides |
25 to >22.0 pts |
22 to >20.0 pts |
20 to >17.0 pts |
17 to >0 pts |
25 pts | |
display elements of effective design.
Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc. are effective, |
Excellent 90%–
100% PPT slides display elements of effective design. |
Good 80%–89%
PPT slides display elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, |
Fair 70%–79%
PPT slides display some elements of effective design. Fonts, colors, |
Poor 0%–69%
PPT slides and formatting detracts from the content |
||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||||
consistent and appropriate to the
topic. Text is clear |
Fonts, colors, backgrounds, etc.
are effective, |
backgrounds, etc. are effective,
consistent and |
backgrounds, etc. are not consistent
and appropriate to |
and/or are
inappropriate for business. |
|||||
and easy for the audience to see. 8
– 10 slides are |
consistent and appropriate to the
topic. Text is clear |
appropriate to the topic. Text is clear
and easy for the |
the topic on all slides. Text is
unclear and not |
Several or all components
are vague, |
|||||
presented Text is
no lower than 30 |
and easy for the
audience to see. 8- |
audience to see.
Less than 8 or |
easy for the
audience to see. |
inaccurate, or
missing. |
|||||
points in size. | 10 slides are presented Text is
no lower than 30 |
more than 10 slides are presented. Text
is no lower than 30 |
Less than 8 or more than 10 slides are
presented. Text |
||||||
points in size. | points in size. | varies in size from slide to slide. | |||||||
Narrated Presentation: |
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent 90%– 100% Presenter was familiar with the material and did not read from slides. It is evident that the presentation was rehearsed. Presenter spoke clearly and slowly enough to be heard by the audience. Presenter showed enthusiasm for the subject matter and encouraged audience interest. |
18 to >16.0 pts Good 80%–89% Presenter was familiar with the material and did not read from slides. The presentation does not appear to have been rehearsed. Presenter spoke clearly and slowly enough to be heard by the audience. Presenter does not show enthusiasm for the subject matter and does not encourage audience interest. |
16 to >14.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Presenter was somewhat familiar with the material and read off the slides. The presentation does not appear to have been rehearsed. Presenter spoke unclear and was too fast to be heard by the audience. Presenter does not show enthusiasm for the subject matter and does not encourage audience interest. |
14 to >0 pts Poor 0%– |
|||||
Presenter was familiar with the material and did not read from
slides. It is evident that the presentation was rehearsed. Presenter spoke clearly and slowly |
69%
The was no narrated presentation accompanied with the slides. |
20 pts |
|||||||
enough to be heard by the
audience. |
|||||||||
Presenter showed enthusiasm for the
subject matter and |
|||||||||
encouraged
audience interest. |
|||||||||
Written Expression and Formatting –
The assignment follows correct APA format for PPT presentations. Reference list slide included. |
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent 90%– 100% Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 to >3.0 pts Good 80%–89% Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors. |
3 to >2.0 pts Fair 70%–79% Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
5 pts |
||||
Total Points: 150 | |||||||||