PHI 413V Week 2 Case Study Moral Positions on a Fetal Abnormality

PHI 413V Week 2 Case Study Moral Positions on a Fetal Abnormality

Write a 750-1000 word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions:

Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain.

How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action?

What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Scroll down to view a sample We did and scored the highest marks

Rubric Criteria

Total 200 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Personal Response to Case Study Personal Response to Case Study	0 points Evaluation of which theory is personally preferable along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is inadequate.	26 points Evaluation of which theory is preferable along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is lacking a personal connection.	30 points Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear.	34 points Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear and relevant.	40 points Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant, and insightful.
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format Organization, Effectiveness, and Format	0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	6.5 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	7.5 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	8.5 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	10 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Recommendation for Action Recommendation for Action	0 points Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is insufficient. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.	26 points Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is unclear. Explanation unclearly supported by topic study materials.	30 points Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.	34 points Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear and demonstrates an understanding of the theory. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.	40 points Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.
Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status	0 points Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is insufficient. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.	39 points Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is unclear. Explanation is not clearly supported by topic study materials.	45 points Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear and explains the basic relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.	51 points Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and and explains the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.	60 points Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.
Determination of Moral Status Determination of Moral Status	0 points The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is not adequately explained. Rationale for choices made is not supported by topic study materials or case study examples.	26 points The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is not clearly explained. Rationale for choices made is unclearly supported by topic study materials or case study examples.	30 points The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained and draws relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is supported by topic study materials and case study examples.	34 points The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples.	40 points The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples.
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	0 points Sources are not documented.	6.5 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	7.5 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	8.5 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	10 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Personal Response to Case Study

0 points

Evaluation of which theory is personally preferable along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is inadequate.

26 points

Evaluation of which theory is preferable along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is lacking a personal connection.

30 points

Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear.

34 points

Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear and relevant.

40 points

Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant, and insightful.

Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

6.5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

7.5 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

8.5 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

10 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Recommendation for Action

0 points

Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is insufficient. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

26 points

Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is unclear. Explanation unclearly supported by topic study materials.

30 points

Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

34 points

Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear and demonstrates an understanding of the theory. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

40 points

Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

0 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is insufficient. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

39 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is unclear. Explanation is not clearly supported by topic study materials.

45 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear and explains the basic relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

51 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and and explains the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

60 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Determination of Moral Status

0 points

The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is not adequately explained. Rationale for choices made is not supported by topic study materials or case study examples.

26 points

The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is not clearly explained. Rationale for choices made is unclearly supported by topic study materials or case study examples.

30 points

The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained and draws relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is supported by topic study materials and case study examples.

34 points

The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples.

40 points

The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

6.5 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

7.5 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

8.5 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

10 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Sample done by one of our top-rated writers

Case Study: Fetal Abnormality

Introduction

Often, different worldviews conflict when people are making tough decisions regarding bioethical processes, including euthanasia and medically approved abortions. In this sense, it takes time to evaluate individual perspectives while mediating moral principles of considering such sensitive endeavors. For instance, the Christian worldview is one of the most profound perspectives that determine how people view bioethical procedures and the potential consequences of undertaking controversial medical interventions. In the “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality,” it is possible to identify conflicting worldviews regarding the morality of maintaining a pregnancy with the prospect of a disabled child. Jessica, Marko, Dr. Wilson, and Auntie Maria possess varied perceptions and thinking dimensions about the potential effects of maintaining a pregnancy with a daunting future because of the underlying conditions, including abnormalities and the presence of Down Syndrome. Arguably, the contradicting worldviews slow decisions and require appropriate mediation of various considerations before settling on any more. Therefore, it is fundamental to consider the Christian view of human nature and establish trade-offs between various theories of moral status relevant in the scenario.

The Christian Worldview of Human Nature

The Christian worldview of human nature is strict in establishing the thresholds, ethical requirements, and spiritual guidelines for humans because they are focal figures in nature. In this sense, Christianity requires Christians to adhere to moral and spiritual obligations relevant in various Biblical narratives. For instance, narratives such as creation, the fall, redemption, and restoration present the importance of maintaining sustainable relationships between humans and God (Dozier et al., 2020). However, these biblical stories come with moral and spiritual bidding for people if they wish to enjoy natural privileges provided by God. One of the most profound ethical and spiritual requirements for Christians is to abide by the Ten commandments that establish the synergies between earthly and heavenly provisions.

Undoubtedly, the Christian worldview cuts across the societal, philosophical, and ethical discourse of human dignity. In this sense, Christians believe that humans are intelligent and central creatures that express high rationality levels, surpassing other organisms (Muller, 2020). Arguably, such a belief relies massively upon the Imago Dei (Image of God) and the restoration narrative. For instance, the Imago Dei perspective endorses the idea that God created humans in his image to reflect his marvel over the earth. Although human physical features are fundamental in reflecting God’s favor and will, Christians tend to extend the image of God principle to accommodate rationality, ethical, and spiritual discourse. As a result, people must portray high-level morality and spirituality because God focuses on the righteousness factor than the physical attributes when deciding human fate.

Reverting to the fetal abnormality case study, it is valid to argue that the Christian worldview blends well with the virtual ethics theory. In this sense, the virtue theory advocates the perspective of doing the right thing regardless of the situation (Guinebert, 2020). Arguably, this theory ignores various aspects of consequentialism, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics that rely massively on the benefits or effects of deciding. Christian values and virtual ethics are inseparable in the sense that the former inspires the latter. For example, the Bible indicates the essentiality of loving “our enemies” and praying for them instead of holding grudges. Essentially, this worldview is strict on love, care, and justice as the guiding principles for humanity and spirituality.

Christianity and virtual ethics would play a fundamental role in solving the dilemma facing Jessica and Marko regarding the trade-offs of maintaining the pregnancy. From the Christianity worldview, it is essential to let God express his will by desisting from terminating pregnancies because he has a good plan for a fetal future. Also, terminating a pregnancy in its second semester means destroying the life and the future of the unborn baby. The Biblical narrative of the Ten commandments is against killing other humans because human life is sacred (Dozier et al., 2020). From the case study, it is possible to argue that Jessica and Aunt Maria understand the Christian worldview of the nature of humans though Jessica has other options to ponder when deciding in favor or against keeping the pregnancy. As a result, the view of life as a sacred aspect should convince her against aborting the pregnancy regardless of future health and economic concerns.

Theories of Moral Status in Question

The case study comprises people with different worldviews because they hold varying perspectives regarding abortion. Marko is willing to assist Jessica in every decision though he has the perception that maintaining the pregnancy would lead to massive economic and health burdens to the family. Considering Marko’s perspective, it is valid to argue that he stands for the consequentialism theory of moral status. In this sense, consequentialism theory endorses the moral dimension that seeks to adopt an action that maximizes positive outcomes (Guinebert, 2020). Therefore, according to Marko, abortion will be the most profound decision to avert negative consequences, including health struggles and economic insecurity.

Dr. Wilson is a pro-consequentialist because he convinces Jessica to embrace abortion as a way of preventing various health concerns facing the fetus. He is sure that this decision will safeguard the family’s future economic security and protect them from multiple psychological and health struggles. On the other hand, Jessica and Maria possess some aspects of the virtue theory because they understand the obligation to do the right regardless of the situation. Although Jessica weighs up better socioeconomic position and increased independence, she has an intrinsic conviction that all life is sacred. Maria is straightforward about the Christian worldview of the nature of humans by convincing Jessica about the need to uphold God’s will by allowing the fetus to grow to its potential. Arguably, varying opinions and standpoints establish the need to mediate between various theories of moral status, including virtue theory and consequentialism.

Personal Perspective of the Case Study and Recommendations

Abortion is one of the most controversial bioethical issues that require effective mediation of morality, spirituality, and medical intentions. Arguably, the case study validates the importance of negotiating different worldviews when deciding in favor or against abortion. Also, it ascertains the essentiality of applying theories of moral status to extract the rationale of taking a specific step in solving the dilemma. I propose the Christian worldview of human nature and virtue ethics when solving the decisional stalemate facing Marko and Jessica. In this sense, Jessica should let God express his will by allowing the fetus to grow and develop regardless of the results of the diagnostic tests. Arguably, upholding the virtue theory of moral status requires her to do the right thing regardless of the imminent consequences or situation. Essentially, the Christian worldview requires people to respect life as a sacred aspect and express love, care, and justice as the fundamental life principles. As a result, Jessica should keep the pregnancy and trust God because he has the purpose for the unborn baby.

Conclusion

Theories of moral status and the Christian worldview are essential aspects that influence personal decisions regarding medical processes such as abortion. The case study about fatal abnormality is an example of a situation that requires people to mediate different ethical theories and perspectives to settle on the best decision. In the case study, it is possible to obtain the relationships between the Christian worldview of human nature and moral theories. In this sense, Christians should endeavor to do right regardless of consequences or benefits emanating from an action. Jessica should maintain the pregnancy to preserve fetal life and observe the biblical commandment. Arguably, such a decision will uphold God’s purpose and comply with various provisions of the virtue theory of moral status.

References used

Dozier, J., Hennink, M., Mosley, E., Narasimhan, S., Pringle, J., & Clarke, L. et al. (2020). Abortion attitudes, religious and moral beliefs, and pastoral care among Protestant religious leaders in Georgia. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0235971. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235971

Guinebert, S. (2020). How do moral theories stand to each other? Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie, 3(2), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-020-00077-1

Müller, S. (2020). Concepts and dimensions of human dignity in the Christian tradition. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society, 6(1), 22-55. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-00601003