PH 480 Lesson 4 Discussion Forum

PH 480 Lesson 4 Discussion Forum

PH 480 Lesson 4 Discussion Forum

PH 480 Lesson 4 Discussion Forum
Immanuel Kant posited that the fundamental principle of morality relates to practical rationality referred to as categorical imperative. This theory asserts the need to always respect the humanity in others and therefore our actions should be governed by rules common to everyone (Fiala & MacKinnon, 2023).

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Therefore, one should act rationally and according to the universal moral law. It means that all humans possess a right to common dignity and respect. This often opposes the concept of utilitarianism which asserts focus on the right action whose focus is promoting good and reducing suffering. It also disregards moral codes and systems, unlike Kant’s theory. One of the issues that these theories are in opposition to is that of euthanasia. According to Kant, killing when an individual is sick is morally wrong and therefore unacceptable (Fiala & MacKinnon, 2023). This is different from utilitarianism which focuses on actions that result in more good than bad. For instance, euthanasia is supported if it reduces suffering for the patient and the family. This shows how these two theories are in direct opposition.
The direct opposition of Kant’s moral theory and utilitarianism can be distinguished in our daily lives. These concepts have different ways of establishing the rightfulness or wrongness of actions. Kantian ethics looks at the intention of the action while under utilitarianism, the focus is on the actions that produce the greatest good. An example in daily life is when students are taking tests. Kant would assert that copying from others is morally wrong since there is a manipulation of others to obtain favorable results. However, utilitarianism suggests that since copying would lead to passing the test, and therefore acceptable. This shows the direct opposition of these two ethical theories.

References
Fiala, A., & MacKinnon, B. (2023). Ethics: Theory and contemporary issues. Wadsworth.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Lesson 4 Discussion Forum (50 points) Kant’s moral theory is in direct opposition to utilitarianism. The focus of Kantian ethics is on the duty of action, not on the consequences. In your daily life, is this a helpful distinction? Why or why not? The posting requirements stated below must be followed precisely to avoid point deduction for the discussion grade.

Post your initial post no later than Wednesday of each week. Your initial post should represent your original thoughts related to the forum topic or question. Post an additional two times in the graded threads. You must post your THREE required posts on THREE separate days of the week to achieve full credit.

Posts must be of substantive quality to receive full credit. For example, ‘good job’ or ‘I agree’ is considered a throwaway post

Aligns with Course Goal 1, 2, & 4 and Module Goal a, b, c

NB: Only use the attached sources.

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?