Personal Reflection Assignment

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on your collaborative practice within the CLC Health Organization Evaluation assignment.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

In 250-500 words, answer the following:

Describe the communication tools and techniques used by your team. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the group when collaborating to complete this project?

What strategy, or approach, would improve your collaborative practice in future projects?

When working in a health care setting, how would interprofessional collaboration work to support quality and the improvement of patient outcomes?

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assigning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 6.2.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Personal Reflection – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total30 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
CLC Team Collaboration Describe the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group.	0 points A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is not included.	6.75 points A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is incomplete or incorrect.	7.11 points A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is included but lacks detail.	8.01 points A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is detailed.	9 points A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is thorough.
Interprofessional Collaboration Describe how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes.	0 points A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is not included.	6.75 points A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.	7.11 points A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is included but lacks detail.	8.01 points A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is detailed.	9 points A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is thorough.
Strategy to Improve Collaboration Discuss a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice.	0 points A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is not included.	6.75 points A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is incomplete or incorrect.	7.11 points A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is included but lacks detail.	8.01 points A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is detailed.	9 points A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.	0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	1.35 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	1.42 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	1.6 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	1.8 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.	0 points Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.	0.9 points Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.	0.95 points Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.	1.07 points Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.	1.2 points No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

CLC Team Collaboration

Describe the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group.

0 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is not included.

6.75 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is incomplete or incorrect.

7.11 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is included but lacks detail.

8.01 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is detailed.

9 points

A description of the CLC team collaboration, including strengths and weaknesses of the group, is thorough.

Interprofessional Collaboration

Describe how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes.

0 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is not included.

6.75 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.

7.11 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is included but lacks detail.

8.01 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is detailed.

9 points

A description of how interprofessional collaboration helps support the improvement of quality and patient outcomes is thorough.

Strategy to Improve Collaboration

Discuss a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice.

0 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is not included.

6.75 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is incomplete or incorrect.

7.11 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is included but lacks detail.

8.01 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is detailed.

9 points

A discussion of a strategy or approach to improve collaborative practice is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1.35 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1.42 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

1.6 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

1.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

0.9 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

0.95 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

1.07 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

1.2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.