NURS 8503 Week 10 Assignment: Reflection on Project Implementation
NURS 8503 Week 10 Assignment: Reflection on Project Implementation
Week 10: Reflection on Project Implementation
How is the project implementation going? What barriers have you experienced? What successes have you witnessed? How might you change your approach or leadership style for future practice change implementation?
These questions will assist you in reflecting on your project implementation experience. Reflection is a key step in helping you analyze the success, barriers, and milestones of your implementation. Reflection will assist you in guiding your implementation as well as making any necessary changes for continued success.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
This week, you will reflect on the current progress of your practice change implementation. What is working? What is not working? What is the value and impact of this change? You will explore the importance of reflection as you move into the final weeks of the practice change implementation.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Reflect on the project implementation
- Evaluate success and sustainability of the project implementation
Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Practicum Resources (click to expand/reduce)
Document: Practicum Time Log and Journal (Word document)
Meditrek. (n.d.). Welcome to Meditrek. https://edu.meditrek.com/Default.html
Note: Use this website to log in to Meditrek to report your clinical hours and patient encounters.
Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation
Study without reflection is a waste of time. Reflection without study is dangerous.
—Confucius (Clark, 2011).
In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?
Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.
Photo Credit: DrAfter123 / DigitalVision Vectors / Getty Images
For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?
Reference:
Clark J. (2011). Let’s reflect: What is the point? British Journal of General Practice, 61(593), 747. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X613232
To Prepare
- Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.
- Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.
By Day 3 of Week 10
Post a response detailing what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation. What lessons have you learned, and how are you evaluating, or plan to evaluate, the implementation? Identify two or three factors to assist in sustaining the change at the practice site. How can you sustain the translation?
By Day 6 of Week 10
Read a selection of your colleagues’ blog posts. Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by expanding on their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 10 Blog Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 10 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 10
To Participate in this Blog:
Week 10 Blog
What’s Coming Up in Module 5?
Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
In the next module, you will conclude your problem change implementation and practicum experience. You will present your implementation, disseminate your results, and reflect on your experience.
Next Module
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_8503_Week10_Blog_Rubric
| Excellent
90–100 |
Good
80–89 |
Fair
70–79 |
Poor
0–69 |
||
| Main Posting:
Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
Points Range: 54 (54%) – 60 (60%)
Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. |
Points Range: 48 (48%) – 53 (53%)
Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. |
Points Range: 42 (42%) – 46 (46%)
Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 41 (41%)
Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. |
|
| Main Posting:
Writing |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Posting:
Timely and full participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Blog post by due date. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Posts main Discussion by due date. Meets requirements for full participation. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts main Blog post by due date. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Blog post by due date. |
|
| First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
|
| First Response: Writing |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing. |
|
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
|
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
|
| Second Response: Writing |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing. |
|
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Name: NURS_8503_Week10_Blog_Rubric