NUR 630 CLC-Quality Models Assignment

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

The purpose of this assignment is to examine quality models used in health care. With your CLC group, create a 12-15 slide PowerPoint on Lean, Six Sigma, and 5S quality models. Include the following in your presentation:

A description of each quality model.

A brief history of each quality model.

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting.

Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed, scholarly references as evidence.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for low visionOpen the accessibility menu

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

CLC – Quality Models – Rubric

ListGrid

Print To PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total100 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
Description of Each Model Description of Each Model	0 points A description of each quality model is not present.	9.6 points A description of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	10.56 points A description of each quality model is present.	11.04 points A description of each quality model is present and detailed.	12 points A description of each quality model is present and thorough.
Brief History of Each Model Brief History of Each Model	0 points A brief history of each quality model is not present.	10.4 points A brief history of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	11.44 points A brief history of each quality model is present.	11.96 points A brief history of each quality model is present and detailed.	13 points A brief history of each quality model is present and thorough.
A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health Care Setting A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health Care Setting	0 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is not present.	12 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	13.2 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present.	13.8 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and detailed.	15 points A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and thorough.
Presentation of Content Presentation of Content	0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.	24 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.	26.4 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.	27.6 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.	30 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout Layout	0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	8 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	8.8 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	9.2 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.	10 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.	0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	8 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	8.8 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	9.2 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	10 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use	0 points Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.	4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.	4.4 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.	4.6 points Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.	5 points Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	0 points Sources are not documented.	4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	4.4 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	4.6 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Description of Each Model

0 points

A description of each quality model is not present.

9.6 points

A description of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

10.56 points

A description of each quality model is present.

11.04 points

A description of each quality model is present and detailed.

12 points

A description of each quality model is present and thorough.

Brief History of Each Model

0 points

A brief history of each quality model is not present.

10.4 points

A brief history of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

11.44 points

A brief history of each quality model is present.

11.96 points

A brief history of each quality model is present and detailed.

13 points

A brief history of each quality model is present and thorough.

A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health Care Setting

0 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is not present.

12 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

13.2 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present.

13.8 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and detailed.

15 points

A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting is present and thorough.

Presentation of Content

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

24 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

26.4 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

27.6 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

30 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

8 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

8.8 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

9.2 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

10 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

8 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

8.8 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

9.2 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

10 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

4.6 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.