NSG6002-Week 2 Project Rubric DQ

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!!NSG6002-Week 2 Project Rubric DQ .

Identify specific legislative District State Governor, areas of focus and interest State Senators, committees and appointments

Student did not submit assignment

Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided.

Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague.

Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment.

Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment.

/ 60

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

No Evidence

0 points

Unsatisfactory

37 points

Satisfactory

43 points

Proficient

48 points

Exemplary

55 points

State Representatives (House), committees and appointments Federal Senators, committee and appointments

Student did not submit assignment

Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts.

Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts.

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts.

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts.

/ 55

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

No Evidence

0 points

Unsatisfactory

34 points

Satisfactory

39 points

Proficient

44 points

Exemplary

50 points

Federal Congressman (House), committees and appointments State Specific legislation involving legislators

Student did not submit assignment

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!!NSG6002-Week 2 Project Rubric DQ .

Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses 1 credible resource in the assignment.

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the assignment.

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment, including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource.

/ 50

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

No Evidence

0 points

Unsatisfactory

6 points

Satisfactory

7 points

Proficient

8 points

Exemplary NSG6002 Week 2 Project Rubric DQ

10 points

Writing, grammar and APA application: Scholarly grammar, use of APA 6th edition formatting, use of headers and primary sources

Student did not submit assignment

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors.

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors.

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors.