Discussion: Protect personal property

Answer each question with 150- 200 words, using references no older than 5 years old, From the Library or Government cites. No Wikibooks!!Please provide references for each question using in-text citations. Please answer the Entire question!!!

What measures may individuals take to protect personal property? Are there limits to those protections? Should a personal property owner be liable under any circumstances if a thief is injured or dies during an attempted theft?

What harm does theft have on commerce in the United States? What can be done to lessen the harm that theft has on the economy? Politely comment on which suggestions from classmates seem more or less viable.

Explain the history and conceptional development of the crime of burglary. Do these developments make sense? What can be done to further refine or develop the crime of burglary? Discuss.

Examine the crime of trespass in a state. What are the distinctions that the law makes about trespass? Do they make sense? Can you think of another provision that might be added, or consider a different way that a criminal could be punished for the offense?

Describe times governments have committed crimes such as terrorism and genocide. What was the alleged motivating factor for the crime(s) of terrorism and or genocide? Did the state face any punishment for its action? If so, what was the punishment?

Determine how a state actor may be held accountable for crimes. Are all states held accountable to the same standards? If a state is punished, how is that state held accountable?

Under what circumstances might someone assert the defenses of necessity or duress? How can the defense of entrapment be raised? To what degree does the literature indicate that these defenses are successful?

Does it appear that defenses are equally assertible for persons falling under different demographic populations? In other words, are defenses to crimes equally effective between men and women, people of different races, religions, and ethnicities? Why or why not?

Question number 9 was paid for but never completed : This is the answer that was provided! If you could please complete?

What is the Felony Murder Rule? One of the theories concerning Felony Murder Rule is that it acts a deterrence to serious felonies. What is the concept of deterrence? Are some pundits correct when they state that the Felony Murder Rule is a deterrent to crime? Why or why not?The Felony Murder Rule is one of the first-degree murder statutes. It is often a murder committed in the commission of a felony. Under the felony murder rule, it is possible to be judged with murder without intent, as long as an element of participation in a felony is present. It is applicable where an individual commits murder alone, during the commission of a felony. In armed robbery, two or more criminals are all charged with murder, even if there was only one shooter. Likewise, when bystanders or victims commit kills someone other than the robbers, the felony murder rule applies. The deterrence concept is used to determine the cost of punishment using all the deterrence elements, including arrest probability, conviction probability, and punishment severity. (Gullapalli, 2019). In the felony murder law, the act of deterrence

Gullapalli, V (2019). The Felony Murder Rule As A ‘Representation Of What’s Wrong In Our Criminal Legal System’. From https://theappeal.org/the-felony-murder-rule-as-a-representation-of-whats-wrong-in-our-criminal-legal-system/