NSG 526-Criminological theory can help inform sentencing options.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! NSG 526-Criminological theory can help inform sentencing options. .

Assignment Details: In Unit 3, you applied critical thinking by explaining how criminological theory can help inform sentencing options. This week, you will further your critical thinking skills by explaining the relationship between criminological theory and felon disenfranchisement.

Felon disenfranchisement refers to the practice of barring individuals who are convicted of felony crimes from voting in political elections. Although this is common in many countries around the world, 6.1 million Americans are prohibited from voting due to felony disenfranchisement. Additionally, this disenfranchisement includes the legal means of denying access to employment, educational opportunities, and welfare programs to those with felony records.For this Unit 4 discussion, you will look at the Sentencing Project and select publications that allow you to explore the relationship between felon disenfranchisement, collateral consequences, and criminological theory.

Complete the following before starting this assignment:

Visit The Sentencing Project Web site here.

Make sure to read through the Felony Disenfranchisement section on the Web site. Pay particular attention to the Key Publications on the Web page.

Complete the following for this assignment:

Select 1 key publication as a foundation of your discussion post.

Using the Internet and peer-reviewed articles, research a criminological theory that best explains felon disenfranchisement as discussed in your key publication.

A good place to start is this article by Uggen, Behrens, and Manza found here.

In the discussion, you will need to summarize felon disenfranchisement with an emphasis on how it affects the individual, his or her family, and the larger community.

Discuss felon disenfranchisement and its relationship to criminological theory.References

The Sentencing Project. (2020). Voting rights. https://www.sentencingproject.org/issues/voting-rights/

Uggen, C., Behrens, A., & Manza, J. (2005). Criminal disenfranchisement. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1(1), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115840

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! NSG 526-Criminological theory can help inform sentencing options. .

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.