Assignment: Week 6 Evidence Presentation/NSG 4000
Assignment: Week 6 Evidence Presentation/NSG 4000
Week 6 – Dropbox Assignment – Dissemination of Evidence Video Presentation
Directions:
In this assignment, you will use the the Unit 4 Evidence Paper to complete a Video Presentation using the same clinical PICOT question and 4 sources ( 3 high level research articles and the course textbook) . Before you complete this presentation, be sure to apply all instructor feedback from the Unit 4 Evidence Paper which was the draft of this assignment. Contact the Galen librarian for support with searching the databases if you need to replace articles and contact Galen technical support for any technical assistance.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
To complete this assignment:
Use a video screencast recorder such as ScreenPal, Microsoft PowerPoint, or Microsoft Stream to record your presentation. Review the guides: ScreenPal’s Screen RecorderLinks to an external site. and Microsoft Stream Screen RecordingLinks to an external site..
You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or similar software to create the presentation content.
Review the Microsoft Office Tips for Creating an Effective PresentationLinks to an external site. and additional Tips for Making Effective PowerPoint PresentationsLinks to an external site.
Your presentation should be organized, attractive, creative, and professional.
Be mindful of your attire, background, language, and possible distractions from family, phones, and pets.
Use contrasting font and background colors and appropriate font sizes to enhance readability.
Use short bulleted points and limit the use of large amount of texts.
Use smart art, graphics, and quality images when appropriate.
Note that you are required to be on camera recording yourself while presenting your screen.
You will need access to a portable or built-in computer camera and microphone for this recording.
Be sure to have adequate room lighting and be mindful of your recorded video and audio quality.
Your final video file (MP4 file preferred) must be less than 500 MB in size.
Do not read from your notes or slide. Prepare by completing each slide beforehand, write notes to use as speaking points or a script, study the material, and rehearse for time management before you record.
In your 4 to 5-minute screen recorder video presentation (on camera recording your screen), use the 3 research articles and assigned course textbook to create the following 10 slides (including title and references):
1. Title Slide
Title of presentation (be creative with your title)
Full name
Name of Institution
Date
2. Introduction
State your interventional PICOT clinical question.
Share your interest or connection to the topic.
3. Justification: Briefly explain one reason why the topic should be investigated. Provide supportive resource for the justification.
4. Evidence-Based Practice Model: Use your textbook as a source to select one evidence-based practice model
Identify and describe the evidence-based practice model.
Identify one key stakeholder and explain the significance of the stakeholder to your proposed project.
5. Summary of Evidence: Create an evidence table on a single slide to summarize the 3 research articles by using the sample table shown below. . Briefly explain in your own words, the design, purpose, sample, methods, and findings for each study.
Article in-text citation in APA format Study design Purpose Sample size and characteristics Methods Findings
Article 1 in-text citation
Article 2 in-text citation
Article 3 in-text citation
6. Analysis of Evidence: In your presentation, use the textbook as a source to provide an analysis of the data by verbally explaining:
What two patterns in the data can you identify? (Consider the sample and its size, study methods, and whether it is appropriate to test the data, similarities/differences in the findings/concepts/themes).
What is one strength of the data and why?
What is one limitation of the data and why?
7. Recommendation for Practice: Based on the data and findings, briefly discuss one recommendation for enhancing clinical practice with the use of supportive evidence from the articles.
8. Recommendation for Research: Based on the research methods, briefly discuss one recommendation for future research with the use of supportive evidence from the textbook.
9. Conclusions: State how the evidence you found support your clinical question.
10. References: Formatted in APA style to include the 3 research articles and assigned course textbook (include in your video but you do not need to narrate the references slide). Ensure to include in-text citations throughout the presentation to credit your sources.
Submission
Adhere to the limit for the number of slides and length of presentation.
Confirm that your video file is less than 500 MB.
Save your recording as video file (MP4 file preferred) to your computer. See the list of Video File Formats Supported by CanvasLinks to an external site..
Review the tutorial on how to Upload Media as a Video File to Canvas DropboxLinks to an external site..
Upload the video file to the Dropbox for grading. Ensure to preview the thumbnail of the video within the Dropbox submission to confirm the file upload before you submit the assignment. If you do not see the video load within the preview after your submission, attach the MP4 file as an attachment to the assignment comments within the dropbox, and contact Galen technical support for assistance.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Rubric
Evidence Video Presentation Grading Rubric 2023.03
Evidence Video Presentation Grading Rubric 2023.03
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
5 pts
Exceptional
Excellent context where presentation clearly identifies • Excellent nurse-related interventional clinical question including all 5 PICOT components. • Personal interest in the nurse-related topic.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No introduction was provided. OR Did not adequately develop a clinical question based on a nurse-related intervention and topic. OR All revisions based on feedback from the week 4 assignment may or may not have been applied. OR No Assignment Submitted
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustification of the Topic
5 pts
Exceptional
Excellent context where presentation clearly explains one reason why the topic should be investigated.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No justification was provided. OR No Assignment Submitted OR All revisions based on feedback from the week 4 assignment may or may not have been applied
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-Based Practice Model
5 pts
Exceptional
Excellent context where presentation clearly discussed the following with the use of supportive evidence: • An EBP model • One stakeholder
3 pts
Developing
Developing context where presentation did not clearly discuss an EBP model and/or stakeholder.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No EBP model was discussed. OR No Assignment Submitted.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Table
10 pts
Exceptional
Excellent context where the presentation included a complete evidence table free from errors. All articles are scholarly/peer-reviewed, and dated within 5 years.
7 pts
Effective
Effective context where the presentation included an evidence table with minor errors.
6 pts
Developing
Developing context where the presentation included an evidence table with multiple errors.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No evidence table was included within the presentation. OR No Assignment Submitted OR None of the articles are scholarly/peer-reviewed, and dated within 5 years.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of Evidence Table
10 pts
Exceptional
Excellent context where the presenter briefly summarizes the evidence from 3 research articles by verbally presenting all of the the following 6 criteria: • Type of study/design • Purpose • Sample • Methods • Results • How the study connects to your clinical question.
7 pts
Effective
Effective context where the presenter briefly summarizes the evidence from 2 research articles by verbally presenting all of the the 6 criteria listed in the first column.
6 pts
Developing
Developing context where the presenter briefly summarizes the evidence from 1 research article by verbally presenting all of the the 6 criteria listed in the first column. OR The presenter briefly summarizes the evidence from the 3 research articles but did not verbally present all of the criteria listed on the first column for each study.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No evidence table was included within the presentation. OR No Assignment Submitted OR None of the articles are scholarly/peer-reviewed, and dated within 5 years. OR The presenter did not verbally present the summarized evidence.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Analysis
20 pts
Exceptional
Excellent context where the presenter clearly presented an analysis of the evidence from 3 studies with excellent rationales on: · two patterns, · one strength, and · one limitation in the data
15 pts
Effective
The presenter effectively presented an analysis of 3 studies meeting 2 of the 3 criteria listed in first column with excellent rationales OR Excellent analysis for 3 studies meeting all 3 criteria with limited rationales.
10 pts
Developing
The presenter presented an analysis of 3 studies meeting only 1 of the 3 criteria listed in first column with excellent rationale OR Excellent analysis for 3 studies meeting all 3 criteria with No rationales.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No evidence analysis was presented within the presentation. OR No Assignment Submitted
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations
10 pts
Exceptional
Excellent context where presentation clearly discusses one recommendation for clinical practice AND one recommendation for future research.
5 pts
Developing
Developing context where presentation did not clearly discuss recommendations for practice and future research.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No recommendations were provided. OR No Assignment Submitted.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions
5 pts
Exceptional
Excellent conclusion clearly summarizes a statement of how the evidence found supports the clinical question.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No conclusion was provided. OR No Assignment Submitted. OR All revisions based on feedback from the week 4 assignment may or may not have been applied.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism and Organization
20 pts
Exceptional
Excellent presentation clearly demonstrates professionalism and organization including: · Presentation is free from background noise and distraction. · Professional use of slide template with appropriate use of visual aids. · Use of short bulleted points and presenter is not reading from slides. · Fonts and print type are large and clear with color enhancing readability. · Excellent video and audio quality. · Clear speech with appropriate verbal skills where the presenter is clearly prepared and appears knowledgeable on the subject matter. · Presenter is dressed in professional attire. · Presentation adhered to the allotted time frame and/or was under 7 minutes.
15 pts
Effective
Effective presentation that demonstrates professionalism and organization meeting at least 6 of the 8 criteria listed in the first column.
10 pts
Developing
Developing presentation that demonstrates professionalism and organization meeting at least 4 of the 8 criteria listed in the first column.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No Assignment Submitted. OR Presentation met less than 4 criteria listed in the first column.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar
5 pts
Exceptional
Excellent presentation clearly adheres to grammar. The text is written with no errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No Assignment Submitted. OR The text is written with multiple errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation. Revisions based on feedback from the week 4 assignment may or may not have been applied.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
5 pts
Exceptional
Excellent presentation clearly adheres to APA formatting. Meeting all 3 criteria: • There is consistent presence of correctly formatted APA in-text citations of the references used on the reference page within the text. • Correct APA formatting on the reference page. • The presentation used at least 4 scholarly peer-reviewed sources dated within the past 5 years.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The presenter did not provide a screencast video and audio recording on camera. OR No Assignment Submitted. OR Does not meet all 3 APA criteria listed in the first column. OR Revisions based on feedback from the week 4 assignment may or may not have been applied.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext