Assignment: Topic 5 Benchmark-Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis
Assignment: Topic 5 Benchmark-Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis
Topic 3 work is attached as PHI413_Topic 3_Assignment_Applying_Four_Principles_Case_Study_Use in T5 Benchmark.docx
Assessment Description
For this final assignment, you will be tasked to review your work in the Topic 3 case study and continue to analyze the case to best determine spiritual care interventions throughout their plan of care. In particular, the focus will be on the Christian application of the four principles, as well as appropriate options in providing a patient with spiritual care.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
Based on the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and reading the topic Resources, complete the “Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis” document in a maximum of 1,500 words, in which you will analyze the case study in relation to the following:
Patient autonomy
Christian perspective and actions related to sickness and health, principles of beneficence, and nonmaleficence
Spiritual needs assessment and appropriate interventions for all involved in providing care
Accountability that would demonstrate an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and person-centered care and participatory approach to care
Note: Participatory approach to care calls for involving stakeholders, particularly the participants in a program or those affected by a given policy, in specific aspects of the evaluation process. The approach covers a wide range of different types of participation, and stakeholders can be involved at any stage of the impact evaluation process, including its design, data collection, analysis, reporting, and managing a study.
Also, person-centered care is “empowering people to take charge of their own health rather than being passive recipients of services” (WHO, 2021). This care strategy is based on the belief that patient views, input, and experiences can help improve overall health outcomes.
Support your response using only the following Topic 5 Resources:
Chapter 5 from the textbook Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care
“Assessing Spiritual Health Through the Use of Spiritual Health Assessment Tools: Indications for End-of-Life Care”
“Faith-Sensitive End-of-Life Care for Children, Young People, and Their Families”
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis – Rubric
Collapse All
1. Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy 30 points
Criteria Description
Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the principle of autonomy
2. Decision-Making, Christian Perspective, and the Principles of Bene cence and Nonmale cence
80 points
Criteria Description
Analysis of how decisions need to be made by the physician and the father, according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spiritual Needs Assessment and Intervention (B) 30 points
Criteria Description
Analysis of how a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father to determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son (C1.2)
|
|
|
|
|
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
4. Professional Standards of Practice (B) 40 points
Criteria Description
Analysis of how to be accountable for the patient and demonstrate it in an ethical manner that reflects professional standards of practice and a patient-centered care and participatory approach to care (C9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.5)
Mechanics of Writing 12 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
Format/Documentation 8 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
Total 200 points