NURS 6635-Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample

NURS 6635-Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample

NURS 6635-Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! NURS 6635-Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample .  

Ashford NRS 493 Literature Review Assignment

Literature Review Part 1 ( Topic Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring)

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Question Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

  • Title page
  • Introduction section
  • A comparison of research questions
  • A comparison of sample populations
  • A comparison of the limitations of the study
  • A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Part 2

Review your strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented. Write a list of at least four resources you will need in order to implement your change proposal. The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-493 NRS-493-O503 Literature Review 60.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) 4: Good (89.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 80.0%
Literature Review 10.0% An introduction is not present. An introduction is present, but it does not relate to the body of the paper. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. There is nothing in the introduction to entice the reader to continue reading. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction provides incentive for the reader to continue reading. An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction is intriguing and encourages the reader to continue reading.
Comparison of Research Questions 20.0% No comparison of research questions is presented. A comparison of research questions is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of research questions is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of research questions is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of research questions is presented.
Comparison of Sample Populations 20.0% No comparison of sample populations is presented. A comparison of sample populations is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of sample populations is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of sample populations is presented.
Comparison of the Limitations of the Study 20.0% No comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A comparison of the limitations of the study is presented, but it is not valid. A cursory though valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A moderately thorough and valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented. A reflective and insightful comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.
Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research 10.0% No conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented, but they are not valid. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid, but they are cursory. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid and moderately thorough. A conclusion and recommendations for further research are reflective and insightful.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 5.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

Literature Evaluation Table

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

Among hospitalized patients 65 years and older (P) how does video monitoring (I) compared to standard care (C) affect rates of falls (O) within three months of implementation (T)? This evidence-based project seeks to determine whether video monitoring of patients can significantly reduce the risk of patient falls. This topic is important because it seeks to reduce the leading cause of injury for elderly patients and significantly improve the safety of hospital settings.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! NURS 6635-Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample .  

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

Votruba, L., Graham, B., Wisinski, J., & Syed, A. Nursing Economics, 34(4), 185+. Cournan, M., Fusco-Gessick, B., & Wright, L. Rehabilitation Nursing Journal, 43(2), 111-115.

 

 

Brown Kramer, J., Sabalka, L., Rush, B., Jones, K., & Nolte, T. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 294-295).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Davis, J., Kutash, M., & Whyte IV, J. (2017). Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(3), 137-142.

 

Article Title and Year Published

 

Video monitoring to reduce falls and patient companion costs for adult inpatients (2016) Improving patient safety through video monitoring (2018) Automated Depth Video Monitoring for Fall Reduction: A Case Study (2020) A comparative study of patient sitters with video monitoring versus in-room sitters (2017)
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

The introduction of video monitoring reduces the rates of falls. Video monitoring is effective in reducing patient falls. A system that creates computer vision of patients’ beds can be used to reduce the rates of falls. The combination of in-room sitters and video monitoring reduces the rates of falls in hospitals.
Purposes/Aim of Study To propose the use of video monitoring as a safe and reliable tool for reducing patient falls. To determine the effectiveness of a video monitoring intervention for reduction of patient falls. To reduce the rates of patient falls using a video monitoring application. To determine the prevalence of patient falls and self-harm using in-room sitters and video monitoring and associated costs.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Quantitative- Quasi-experimental study Quantitative- sequential cohort design, an experimental study Quantitative- Quasi-experimental study Quantitative- quasi-experimental approach
Setting/Sample

 

Single-center convenience sampling 115‐bed Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility 13 hospitals in the United States Nonrandomized consecutive sample in a West Central Florida teaching facility
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

Quasi-experimental: An intervention using videos and bedside sitter was implemented Total fall rates were tracked before and after installation of video monitoring units Total fall rates were tracked before and after installation of video monitoring units Monthly basis data collection on rates of falls of patients
Analysis

 

Pre and post-intervention analyses of rates of falls Statistical analysis of rates of falls pre and post-implementation Statistical analysis of rates of falls pre and post-implementation Descriptive statistics and independent samples t tests were performed
Key Findings

 

Video monitoring has a 35% reduction in falls compared to the presence of a sitter Rates of falls were 6.34 per 1,000 patient‐days and a year after implementation of the program reduced to 5.099 falls per 1,000 patient‐days There was a significant reduction of the rates of falls in all 13 hospitals Although there was no statistically significant reduction in rates of patient falls, video monitoring was found to be less expensive than using sitters
Recommendations

 

Video monitoring is safe and effective in reducing rates of falls and should be applied. Video monitoring produces statistically significant decrease in rates of falls The video monitoring application is effective in reducing rates of falls Video monitoring should be used to reduce the costs of reducing patient falls
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

The article compares the intervention and comparison groups in the PICOT question hence providing evidence that the suggested intervention is effective. Preventing Fall Using Video Monitoring Literature Review Sample The study presents evidence of effectiveness of video monitoring hence suggesting the use of the intervention in reducing patient falls The use of video monitoring application is an application-specific analysis of the intervention in the capstone project hence supporting the suggested intervention. The article looks into the cost and safety of video monitoring and recommends it on the basis of reducing costs of patient falls
Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

Sand-Jecklin, K., Johnson, J. R., & Tylka, S. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 31(2), 131-138.

https://doi.org/10.1097/

NCQ.0000000000000163

Klymko, K., Etcher, L., Munchiando, J., & Royse, M. Medsurg Nursing, 25(5), 329. King, B., Pecanac, K., Krupp, A., Liebzeit, D., & Mahoney, J. The Gerontologist, 58(2), 331-340.

https://doi.org/101093/

geront/gnw156

Sand-Jecklin, K., Johnson, J., Tringhese, A., Daniels, C., & White, F. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 34(2), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1097/

NCQ.0000000000000355

Article Title and Year Published

 

Protecting patient safety: Can video monitoring prevent falls in high-risk patient populations? (2016) Video monitoring: a room with a view, or a window to challenges in falls prevention research? (2016) Impact of fall prevention on nurses and care of fall risk patients (2018) Video monitoring for fall prevention and patient safety: process evaluation and improvement (2019)
Research Questions (Qualitative)/

Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

Can video monitoring prevent falls in high-risk patient populations? (a) How are the antecedents to a preventable fall in patient rooms on a medical unit described? (b) How do the identified antecedents appear on the screen to a VM technician monitoring patients on a medical unit? (c) What are the environmental conditions and patient behaviors that should precipitate fall prevention action during VM? How does the “zero falls” initiative driven by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) affect the experiences of nurses in prevention of patient falls? How can video monitoring best practices be implemented to enhance its effectiveness?
Purposes/Aim of Study To study the feasibility of a video monitoring system to reduce rates of falls. To explore antecedents to falls in the acute care setting. To explore nurses’ experiences in fall prevention in hospital settings. To evaluate the monitoring process at a large teaching hospital, with the goal of making improvements and standardizing monitoring practices.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Narrative qualitative study Phenomenological qualitative study Qualitative Grounded Dimensional Analysis (GDA) Phenomenological qualitative study
Setting/Sample

 

A large teaching hospital Single rehabilitation hospital 27 RNs and CNAs in medical/surgical units caring for patients 65 years and older Patients and nursing staff at a large teaching hospital
Methods: Intervention/

Instruments

 

Analysis of the feasibility of the system given the hospital environment and capabilities. Focus groups of hospital staff supporting patient video monitoring program In-depth one-on-one interviews and focus groups were used for data collection Perceptions of nurses and staff were elicited using a survey and technicians’ perceptions elicited in interviews
Analysis

 

Analysis of economic and operational feasibility Thematic analysis of findings from the focus groups open, axial, and selective coding Content analysis of the surveys and interviews
Key Findings

 

Video monitoring is feasible in the large teaching hospital. Video monitoring can lead to understanding behaviors leading to falls but more research is needed. Numerous messages from administration led to fear of falls, protection of self and the unit, and restraint of patients to reduce falls. Video monitoring was perceived by all participants as effective in reducing patient falls
Recommendations

 

Implementation of video monitoring is recommended for reduction of falls More research on the use of video monitoring should be conducted. Video monitoring can be used to reduce rates of falls. The study showed that patient fall reduction strategies may cause unintended consequences and hence the need to reduce the risk of such consequences. Continuous monitoring of patients was recommended as an effective means of reducing fall rates
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

The article presents a review of whether the intervention can be implemented in the study area and hence provides a basis for understanding the key barriers. The article presents the current state of the literature on video monitoring and proposes the implementation of the EBP intervention. The article identifies the unintended consequences of patient falls and hence directs how patient fall prevention should be implemented, hence supporting the use of video monitoring as an intervention. The article supports the intervention in the proposed EBP project.
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?