Agile project management (APM) Discussion 2
Agile project management (APM) Discussion 2
Each reply must be a minimum of 200 words and include at least 2 scholarly resources. Acceptable sources include the textbook, the Bible, outside scholarly articles, etc.
Substantive replies, in contrast to perfunctory replies, add value to the discussion, enhance learning, and contain references to any new concepts or ideas presented.
The following suggestions will aid you in successfully composing substantive responses:
• Compare/contrast the findings of others with your research.
• Compare how the findings of others relate/add to the concepts learned in the required readings.
• Share additional knowledge regarding the key topic that relates to the thread.
Kristin Barton
RE: Agile Project Management
Attachment
COLLAPSE
Discussion Board 1 – Agile Project Management
Agile project management (APM) Discussion 2
This paper discusses agile project management (APM) in comparison to traditional methodologies. APM was originally implemented in software development, but has since been implemented in a variety of business industries and departments. APM is important for businesses who face continuous change in the production of their products. While traditional approaches are logical and placed within a linear sequence, APM offers an improved and efficient method while pursuing stakeholder value.Key Concept ExplanationAPM is an alternative strategic business approach that takes a large project and breaks it into smaller steps or tasks. Each step or task is considered an iteration or milestone within the project life cycle. The emphasis of APM is placed on customer satisfaction, quickly responding and adapting to changes presented by the customer or the environment and to be addressed during the next iteration. APM begins with a tentative plan and then, during the execution of the task, modifications are made and the actual planning is performed. As a result, APM is a nonlinear approach that places more emphasis on flexible collaboration. This topic was chosen because of my personal interest in project management approaches that require flexibility due to environmental pressures as well as academic curiosity.Comparison The information provided from the module in comparison to the research completed was informative. The module provided the basic introduction regarding APM, which was adequate for a student who is unfamiliar with the approach. The module compared to the research provided a comparison of APM to a traditional waterfall approach. This comparison is frequently examined and research. For example,
Turginbayeva et al. (2020) demonstrated how traditional methods first require a master plan and then change management must monitor and minimize any negative effects to the project changes, while APM is more efficient in its deployment of plans that are easily modified throughout the process.The concept of APM as well as traditional project management approaches were illuminated by the added details throughout the research. Thesing et al. (2021) provided further detail on the advantages and disadvantages of choosing APM over traditional methods while Krehbiel and Miller (2018) further explored the benefits of APM within quality management. Both the module and the research articles, especially the article by Petrillo et al. (2018), expressed that APM offers an array of practices that can be applied in part or in whole to improve weak areas found within traditional project management approaches. The completed research provided further exploration of APM in industries and departments not specific to software development.Article Summary The article for this discussion is titled “Traditional vs Agile Project Management in the Service Sector” and was chosen because of an interest in not only a flexible management approach but also because of an interest in applying APM to a service area as opposed to software development within the information technology sector. Through a comparative analysis, the article examined APM in contrast to three traditional methodologies (PMI, IPMA, and PRINCE2). While a specific entity or industry within the service sector was never officially identified, the description and areas that would benefit from APM were discussed. These areas or characteristics included the variability, intangibility, and the immediate consumption. These features of the service sector were examined throughout the paper through the lenses of both APM and traditional approaches. The comparison was examined throughout the following eight areas of project management: schedule, cost, organization and communication, risk and change management, quality, procurement, and stakeholder. The generalized outcome for implementing certain elements and values of APM within the service sector resulted in the shortening of a planning period, reduced hesitation and reluctancy toward change, and encouraged cooperation from stakeholders (Grebi?, 2019). Ares of the service industry benefitting from APM included breaking large service tasks into smaller segments, reflection periods before or following a task, visualization of the workflow and user-stories, easier prioritization of tasks, ongoing teamwork, and more interaction with clients or consumers. According to this article, while traditional project management approaches were utilized more often in the service sector, APM offered an approach that was complementary and improved the efficiency of processes and tasks.Biblical Integration Agile project management (APM) Discussion 2
When viewing APM from a biblical worldview, there are two different perspectives. First, the following verse comes to mind: “the heart of man plans his ways, but the Lord establishes his steps” (Proverbs 16:9, English Standard Version). In this verse, men can set up an initial plan just as a project manager sets up their tentative plan. However, as the tasks proceed and feedback is received, the plans are adjusted and modified. While the project manager and team members work together to meet the goals of the project, God helps his people by gently guiding them throughout life to achieve a certain goal or, ultimately, live eternally with Him.
From a second viewpoint, the Christian project manager is positioned to responsibly implement procedures that are both effective and efficient. In this manner, they are implementing a lifestyle of diligence (Proverbs 21:5, ESV). The project manager is also demonstrating wisdom and making the best use of their time (Ephesians 5:15-16, ESV). Both of these qualities not only improve the company’s outcomes, but also demonstrate conscientious, Christian living.