HCR561: IRB Case Presentation Analysis
HCR561: IRB Case Presentation Analysis
Introduction: State your stance on the case study here. The four criteria listed below will then take you through the process to look at the ethical impact the decision will have.
1. Issues and Points of Conflict (Submit as many issues as needed to cover the given case study – one page required.)
· Issue One: Name the issue and describe the nature of the moral conflict
· Issue Two: Name the issue and describe the nature of the moral conflict
· Issue Three: Name the issue and describe the nature of the moral conflict
· Issue Four: Name the issue and describe the nature of the moral conflict
2. Interested Parties (Name as many as possible– one page required.)
· Name of interested party #1 has:
· interested party’s legitimate/reasonable expectations are considered here
· Name of interested party #2 has:
· interested party’s legitimate/reasonable expectations are considered here
· Name of interested party #3 has:
· interested party’s legitimate/reasonable expectations are considered here
· Name of interested party #4 has:
· interested party’s legitimate/reasonable expectations are considered here
· Name of interested party #5 has:
· interested party’s legitimate/reasonable expectations are considered here
3. Consequences
· Submit the consequences here for any action or inaction on the expectations noted above for the interested parties.
4. Obligations
· Submit the IRB obligations here and the ethical principles that support the position you have taken on whether or not Amazing IRB should approve the consent (as stated in Introduction).
References
Submit a four (4) page analysis of the case that is outlined below. Spelling and grammar count, so be sure to check/review your paper prior to submission. Use APA formatting for citations and references (at least 3) to support your arguments. The reference page is not included in the page count.
In the introduction paragraph, include your position on whether or not the IRB should approve the study.
1. What are the ethical issues and points of conflict in this case? (one full page, double spaced, and bulleted)
2. Who are the interested parties affected by the issues/conflicts and what are their reasonable expectations? (one full page, double spaced, and bulleted)
3. If the interested parties acted on their expectations what would be the probable consequences? REMEMBER: Consequences can be multifaceted. (one full page, double spaced, and bulleted)
4. What are the obligations of the Amazing IRB? (one full page, double spaced, and bulleted)
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.